“For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins” (Hebrews 10:4).
While the people of Old Testament Israel received genuine forgiveness through their sacrificial offerings, there were two inherent deficiencies in the Old Covenant system. The first is mentioned in the passage quoted above: the blood of bulls, goats, and other sacrificial animals could not remove sins. The second issue is one we have mentioned previously: those sacrificial offerings did nothing to change the internal attitudes and motivations of those who brought them.
This leads us to an important theological concept: “atonement.” This word can be defined as “the act by which God restores a relationship of harmony and unity between Himself and human beings.” (1) While the Old Covenant sacrificial system was distinguished by several different types of offerings, it primarily involved the death of an animal that served to atone for the sin of the person who brought it.
These offerings were governed by several provisions. First, the person seeking atonement had to provide an acceptable animal for sacrifice. The animal chosen for sacrifice also had to be free of blemish or defect. Finally, the person offering the sacrifice had to personally identify with the sin that was about to result in that animal’s death.
The following commentators lend their insights to the limitations of this system and the need for something better in the form of the New Covenant..
“Moral defilement cannot be removed by material means… The writer to the Hebrews was not the first man to appreciate this; the truth had been grasped centuries earlier, as by the penitent psalmist who prayed: ‘Create in me a clean heart, O God; And renew a right spirit within me …. For thou delightest not in sacrifice; else would I give it: Thou hast no pleasure in burnt-offering. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: A broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise’ [Ps.51:10,16f].” (2)
“Not the least of the reasons why animal sacrifices could be of no avail lies in the fact that animals never belonged to man in the first place. ‘For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills, saith the Lord (Ps. 50:10). It was thus manifestly erroneous for man to think that by sacrificing some of his fellow creatures of a lower order than himself, and which like himself were the property of God, he could make any true expiation for his sins.” (3)
(1) “Atonement” Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Dictionary. General Editor Ronald F. Youngblood, Copyright © 1986, 1995 by Thomas Nelson Publishers.
(2) The New International Commentary On The New Testament – The Epistle To The Hebrews, F. F. Bruce, General Editor © Copyright 1964, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. Grand Rapids, Michigan [pg. 229]
(3) Coffman, James Burton. “Commentary on Hebrews 10”. “Coffman’s Commentaries on the Bible”. https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/bcc/hebrews-10.html. Abilene Christian University Press, Abilene, Texas, USA. 1983-1999.